[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Collational formula query
- Subject: Re: Collational formula query
- From: Donald Farren <p00244@PSILINK.COM>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 1994 14:06:52 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <9410051858.AA21826@worldlink.worldlink.com>
- Message-ID: <"AqO8s1.0.D08.ZXCCn"@sul2>
- Sender: Rare Books and Special Collections Forum <EXLIBRIS@RUTVM1.BITNET>
TB may be right that you have "blank leaf wraparounds" and that you
have "concealed stubs" that you did not notice. But since you described
the first two leaves of your book as "preliminary leaves" (therefore
printed, I infer) and since you wrote that "the copy is untrimmed in its
original paper covers, making it easy to see conjugacy, cancels,
etc."--what you described appears to me (I leave to you to convert the
following "in 8s" and "in 4" to superscripts) to be: pi1,2 A-L in 8s
[M] in 4 (-[M]1,2 = pi1,2).
>DATE: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 13:42:00 -0700
>FROM: Hoag Elaine <ELH@ABS.NLC-BNC.CA>
>
>I am cataloguing the following item: Banque nationale precedee de l'examen
>des principales banques publiques de l'Europe, et de la caisse d'escompte
>... / par M. Gaudot -- Amsterdam : s.n., 1789. The book is an octavo
>printed on grape-watermark laid paper, and the copy is untrimmed in its
>original paper covers, making it easy to see conjugacy, cancels, etc.
>
>Following 2 preliminary unsigned leaves (not conjugate), collation follows
>regularly in 8s from A-K. Then there are 2 stubs (from which I believe the
>2 prelim. leaves were cut); then 8 leaves of quire L, all signed regularly;
>then 2 unsigned leaves that are conjugate with the 2 stubs that precede
>gathering L.
>
>I am uncertain how to construct a collational formula that will account for
>the true makeup of the book--that gathering L is actually contained inside
>an unsigned gathering of 4 leaves, from which the first 2 leaves have been
>removed. The best I can come up with on my own is: chi superscript 4
>(-chi1,2; chi2+Lsuperscript 8). This looks peculiar, though--particularly
>the portion following the semicolon, because chi2 isn't really "there" to be
>followed by anything. I realize there are several ways I can construct the
>formula if I ignore the actual structure of the book, but I would appreciate
>any suggestions Exlibris subscribers can provide.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Elaine Hoag, Rare book cataloguer
> National Library of Canada, Ottawa
> elh@abs.nlc-bnc.ca
<*>-==--==--==--==--==--==--==-<*>-==--==--==--==--==--==--==-<*>
Donald Farren voice 301.951.9479
email p00244@psilink.com fax 301.951.9479 + 23
4009 Bradley Lane, Chevy Chase, MD 20815
<*>-==--==--==--==--==--==--==-<*>-==--==--==--==--==--==--==-<*>